Geospatial data for sustainable development goals monitoring: A case study of forest cover dynamics in Romania
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55779/ng52344Keywords:
geospatial, forest, SDG, visualization, maps, RomaniaAbstract
Monitoring, evaluating, and implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), as defined by the United Nations’ 2030 Agenda - require the integration of high-quality, up-to-date datasets with a spatial component. Among the indicators in this group is SDG 15.1.1, which measures “Forest area as a proportion of total land area”. In this study, we demonstrate how open-source geospatial datasets (such as those provided by the Copernicus Land Monitoring Services) can be combined with long-term national statistical data from the National Institute of Statistics (INS) to gain insights into forest cover dynamics between 1990 and 2023. Statistical and spatial analyses were conducted on time-series data to map the evolution of forest cover across all Romanian counties (NUTS 3), as well on the national level and by local administrative unit (LAU). The dataset comprises 34 annual records, enabling both the analysis of macro-level trends and the identification of annual anomalies. Our analysis reveals a stable national average forest cover, but with pronounced heterogeneity at the county level. Certain counties recorded notable increases or losses in forest area, some exhibiting abrupt year-to-year reversals or near-static forest levels over decades. Our analysis also highlights inconsistencies in national forest cover reporting across different sources. Comparing information from different sources – INS, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and Copernicus Land High Resolution Layer (HRL) – shows that varying reporting methods and dataset structures lead to different results, depending on the data used. These findings highlight the necessity of integrating diverse data sources and geospatial approaches to ensure accurate and scalable assessments of forest dynamics in support of sustainable development objectives.
Metrics
References
Albulescu AC, Manton M, Larion D, Angelstam P (2022). The winding road towards sustainable forest management in Romania, 1989-2022: A case study of post-communist social–ecological transition. Land 11(8):1198. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081198
Andries A, Morse S, Murphy RJ, Lynch J, Woolliams ER (2022). Using data from Earth observation to support sustainable development indicators: An analysis of the literature and challenges for the future. Sustainability 14(3):1191. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031191
Bhunia GS, Shit PK, Sengupta D (2021). Free-open access geospatial data and tools for forest resources management. In: Shit PK, Pourghasemi HR, Das P, Bhunia GS (Eds). Spatial Modeling in Forest Resources Management. Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56542-8_28
Blaga L, Ilieș DC, Wendt JA, Rus I, Zhu K, Dávid LD (2023). Monitoring forest cover dynamics using orthophotos and satellite imagery. Remote Sensing 15(12):3168. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15123168
CLMS (2024). Forest type 2018 (raster 10 m and 100 m), Europe, 3-yearly. European Union’s Copernicus Land Monitoring Service information. Retrieved 2024 November 1 from https://land.copernicus.eu/en/products/high-resolution-layer-forest-type/forest-type-2018, https://doi.org/10.2909/59b0620c-7bb4-4c82-b3ce-f16715573137
Davidescu S, Buzogány A (2021). Cutting deals: Transnational advocacy networks and the European Union Timber Regulation at the eastern border. The International Spectator 56(3):105-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2021.1935680
Dumitrașcu M, Kucsicsa G, Dumitrică C, Popovici EA, Vrînceanu A, Mitrică B, Mocanu I, Șerban PR (2020). Estimation of future changes in aboveground forest carbon stock in Romania: A prediction based on forest-cover pattern scenario. Forests 11(9):914. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11090914
Estoque RC (2020). A review of the sustainability concept and the state of SDG monitoring using remote sensing. Remote Sensing 12:1770. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12111770
FAO (2020). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020: Report Romania. Retrieved 2024 November 1 from https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/ca117c76-b338-4ea0-9657-b97d6b60345c/content
FAO (2020). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020: Main report, Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9825en
Georgescu I, Nica I (2024). Evaluating the determinants of deforestation in Romania: Empirical evidence from an autoregressive distributed lag model and the Bayer–Hanck cointegration approach. Sustainability 16(13):5297. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135297
Giuliani G (2024). Time-first approach for land cover mapping using big Earth observation data time-series in a data cube – a case study from the Lake Geneva region (Switzerland). Big Earth Data 8(3):435-466. https://doi.org/10.1080/20964471.2024.2323241
Giuliani G, Chatenoux B, Benvenuti A, Lacroix P, Santoro M, Mazzetti P (2020). Monitoring land degradation at national level using satellite Earth observation time-series data to support SDG15 – exploring the potential of data cube. Big Earth Data 4(1):3-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/20964471.2020.1711633
Giurcă A, Dima DP (Eds) (2022). The Plan B for Romania’s Forests and Society. Transylvania University Press.
Guo H (2024). SDG 15, Life on Land. In: Big Earth Data in Support of the Sustainable Development Goals (2022) – The Belt and Road. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-3278-4_8
IFN (2025). Inventarul forestier national [National forest inventory]. Retrieved 2025 April 19 from https://roifn.ro/site/rezultate-ifn-2/
INS (2024). AGR301A - Suprafața fondului forestier pe categorii de terenuri și specii de păduri, macroregiuni, regiuni de dezvoltare și județe [AGR301A – Forest Area by Land Categories and Tree Species, Macroregions, Development Regions, and Counties]. Retrieved 2024 November 1 from http://statistici.insse.ro/tempoins/index.jsp?page=tempo3&lang=ro&ind=AGR301A
IPBES (2019). Global assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Brondízio ES, Settele J, Díaz S, Ngo HT (Eds). IPBES Secretariat, Bonn, Germany.
Johnson BA, Umemiya C, Magcale-Macandog DB, Estoque RC, Hayashi M, Tadono T (2023). Better monitoring of forests according to FAO’s definitions through map integration: Significance and limitations in the context of global environmental goals. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 122:103452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2023.103452
Keskes MI, Mohamed AH, Borz SA, Niţă MD (2025). Improving national forest mapping in Romania using machine learning and Sentinel-2 multispectral imagery. Remote Sensing 17(4):715. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17040715
Knorn J, Kuemmerle T, Radeloff VC, Szabo A, Mindrescu M, Keeton WS, Abrudan I, Griffiths P, Gancz V, Hostert P (2012). Forest restitution and protected area effectiveness in post-socialist Romania. Biological Conservation 146(1):204-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.12.020
Labohm B, Wolff M, Haase D (2025). Integration of high-resolution data for a complementary assessment of forest dynamics in Europe. Methods X 14:103303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2025.103303
Nesha K, Herold M, De Sy V, Duchelle AE, Martius C, Branthomme A, Garzuglia M, Jonsson O, Pekkarinen A (2021). An assessment of data sources, data quality and changes in national forest monitoring capacities in the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005-2020. Environmental Research Letters 16:054029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd81b
Niță MD, Munteanu C, Gutman G, Abrudan I, Radeloff VC (2018). Widespread forest cutting in the aftermath of World War II captured by broad-scale historical Corona spy satellite photography. Remote Sensing of Environment 204:322-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.10.021
Popa B, Niță MD, Hălălișan AF (2019). Intentions to engage in forest law enforcement in Romania: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Forest Policy and Economics 100:33-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.11.005
Potapov P, Hansen MC, Pickens A, Hernandez-Serna A, Tyukavina A, Turubanova S, Zalles V, Li X, Khan A, Stolle F, Harris N, Song XP, Baggett A, Kommareddy I, Kommareddy A (2022). The Global 2000-2020 land cover and land use change dataset derived from the Landsat archive: First results. Frontiers in Remote Sensing 3:1-22. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2022.856903
Prăvălie R, Niculiţă M, Roşca B, Patriche C, Dumitraşcu M, Marin G, Nita IA, Bandoc G, Birsan MV (2023). Modelling forest biomass dynamics in relation to climate change in Romania using complex data and machine learning algorithms. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 37(5):1669-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-022-02359-z
Salhab M, Basiri A (2020). Spatial data quality evaluation for land cover classification approaches. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences V-3-2020:681-687. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2020-681-2020
See L, Fritz S, Moorthy I, Danylo O, van Dijk M, Ryan B (2018). Using remote sensing and geospatial information for sustainable development. In: Desai RM, Kato H, Kharas H, McArthur JW (Eds). From Summits to Solutions: Innovations in Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals. Brookings Institution Press pp 172-198.
UN-GGIM: Europe (2019). The territorial dimension in SDG indicators: Geospatial data analysis and its integration with statistical data. Instituto Nacional de Estatística, Lisboa. Retrieved 2024 October 1 from https://un-ggim-europe.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/UN_GGIM_08_05_2019-The-territorial-dimension-in-SDG-indicators-Final.pdf
Vasile M (2020). The rise and fall of a timber baron: Political forests and unruly coalitions in the Carpathian Mountains of Romania. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110(6):1952-1968. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1723399
Vasile M, Iordăchescu G (2022). Forest crisis narratives: Illegal logging, datafication and the conservation frontier in the Romanian Carpathian Mountains. Political Geography 96:102600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102600
Zaczek M, Walęzak M, Olecka A, Waśniewska S, Paczosa A (2023). Accuracy of the Copernicus High-Resolution Layer Forest Type (HRL FTY) assessed with domestic NFI sampling plots in Poland. Environmental Protection and Natural Resources 34(4):44-61. https://doi.org/10.2478/oszn-2023-0016
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Marius BUDILEANU, Andreea Florentina MARIN

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Distribution - Permissions - Copyright
Papers published in Nova Geodesia are Open-Access, distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
© Articles by the authors; licensee SMTCT, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright/to retain publishing rights without restriction.
License:
Open Access Journal - the journal offers free, immediate, and unrestricted access to peer-reviewed research and scholarly work, due to SMTCT support to increase the visibility, accessibility, and reputation of the researchers, regardless of geography and their budgets. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.





































