Multi-resolution analysis of gravity anomalies: A comparative study of modern and spherical approximation techniques
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55779/ng53337Keywords:
gravimetric technique, gravity anomalies, modern technique, multi-resolution analysis, satellite gravimetry and spherical approximationAbstract
Analysing gravity anomalies is a key method of understanding the Earth’s shape, structure, and subsurface composition. This is done by modeling the Geoid, an irregular surface, into a regular sphere or ellipsoid for easy computations. These approximations, however, result in some inaccuracies in prospecting for underground minerals using satellite gravimetric data. This study aims to perform a multi-resolution analysis for interpreting satellite-obtained gravity anomalies computed by the modern approach and spherical approximation to determine the performances of both gravity anomaly computation techniques for mineral exploration. The satellite-acquired modern and spherical approximated gravity anomalies over a study area were separated into regional and residual gravity anomaly components using a 2D Discrete Wavelet Transform. The quantity, depth, shape, and density of deposited mineral were computed from their respective residual gravity anomalies using the 2D Continuous Wavelet Transform and Modulus Maxima of the wavelet transform coefficients. The result obtained from using spherical approximated gravity anomalies data was less satisfactory due to its lower Regional-to-Residual Ratio (RRR) and high variance as well as high Root Mean Square Error. Compared with the results of the modern defined gravity anomalies, the use of spherical approximation data gave an over-estimated quantity of mineral deposits by 6.44%. Also, at a 99% confidence level, the computed densities and density variances were overestimated by 1.3% and 0.92%, respectively. Hence, gravity anomaly data computed with modern technique is recommended for an optimum interpretation of gravity anomalies for exploration purposes.
Metrics
References
Abdelrahman E, Gobashy M (2017). Depth and shape solutions from residual gravity anomalies due to simple geometric structures using a statistical approach. Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy 47(2):113-132. https://doi.org/10.1515/CONGEO-2017-0008
Abubakar T, Idowu TO (2013). Numerical investigation into the double Fourier analysis for determination of quantity of underground mineral deposit. International Journal of Civil, Structural, Environmental and Infrastructure 3(2):145-154.
Abubakar T, Idowu TO (2014). Determination of type of underground mineral deposit in Gongola basin, Nigeria, using gravimetric technique. International Journal of Science and Technology 4(1):17-25.
Barthelmes F (2013). Definition of functionals of the geopotential and their calculation from spherical harmonic models: theory and formulas used by the calculation service of the International Centre for Global Earth Models (ICGEM) (Scientific Technical Report; 09/02), Potsdam: Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ, 32 p. https://doi.org/10.2312/GFZ.b103-0902-26
Bassey NE, Barka J, Musa H, Abubakar T (2017). Hydrocarbon prospect of Nigeria’s Gongola Basin based on Gravity Data Interpretation. IOSR Journal of Applied Geology and Geophysics 5(2):68-77. https://doi.org/10.9790/0990-0502016877
Chamoli A (2006). Interpretation of gravity data using wavelet transform. 6th International Conference and Exposition on Petroleum Geophysics. Kolkata pp 278-282.
Chanh TDQ, Hieu DD, Xuan VT (2017). Interpretation of gravity anomaly data using the wavelet transform modulus maxima. Journal of Marine Science and Technology 17(4B):151-160. https://doi.org/10.15625/1859-3097/17/4B/13003
El Habiby MM (2007). Wavelet representation of geodetic operators. PhD Thesis, Department of Geomatics Engineering, Calgary, Alberta.
Elyasi I, Zarmehi S (2009). Elimination noise by adaptive wavelet threshold. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 56(2):462-466.
Ergen B (2013). Comparison of wavelet types and thresholding methods on wavelet based denoising of heart sounds. Journal of Signal and Information Processing 4:164-167. https://doi.org/10.4236/jsip.2013.43b029
Eshaghzadeh A (2016). Identification of suitable discrete wavelet for gravity data decomposition. 2nd National Conference of Geology and Exploration of Resources, Shiraz, Iran. Institute of Geophysics University of Tehran Tehran, Iran.
Famiglietti JS, Rodell M (2013). Water in the balance. Science 340(6138):1300-1301. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1236460
Fedi M, Quarta T (1998). Wavelet analysis for regional-residual separation of gravity anomalies. Geophysical Prospecting 46(4):507-525. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1236460
Flechtner F, Schmidt R, Meyer U, Dahle C, Neumayer KH (2016). GRACE, GRACE-FO, and future satellite gravimetry missions. In: Rummel R et al. (Eds). Gravity, Geoid and Height Systems. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2015_213
Hofmann-Wellenhof B, Moritz H (2006). Physical geodesy. Springer Science & Business Media.
Idowu TO (2005). Determination and utilization of optimum residual gravity anomalies for mineral exploration. PhD thesis, Department of Surveying and Geoinformatics, University of Lagos.
Ilesanmi KS (2021). Separation of gravity anomalies into regional and residual components using threshold estimators in wavelet domain. MSc Dissertation, Department of Surveying and Geoinformatics, the Federal University of Technology Akure.
Ilesanmi KS, Idowu TO (2024). Development of user’s friendly algorithm for gravimetric data processing using Visushrink thresholds technique in a standalone tool. ATBU Journal of Environmental Technology 17(1):142-156.
Ince ES, Barthelmes F, Reißland S, Elger K, Förste C, Flechtner F, Schuh H (2019). ICGEM – 15 years of successful collection and distribution of global gravitational models, associated services, and future plans. Earth System Science Data 11:647-674. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-647-2019
Kessler BM, Payne GL, Polyzou WN (2008). Wavelet notes. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.nucl-th/0305025
Li Y, Oldenburg DW (2001). 3-D inversion of gravity data. Geophysics 63(1):109-119.
Martelet G, Sailhac P, Moreau F, Diament M (2001). Characterization of geological boundaries using 1-D wavelet transform on gravity data. Theory and application to the Himalayas. Geophysics 66(4):1116-1129. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1487060
Mousavi N, Ardestani VE, Moosavi H (2013). Effective residual and regional gravity anomaly separation using 1-D & 2-D stationary wavelet transform. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Pattern Recognition Applications and Methods (ICPRAM 2013) pp 659-668. https://doi.org/10.5220/0004219806590668
Peidou AC, Vergos GS (2015). Wavelet multi-resolution analysis of recent GOCE/GRACE GGMs. In: Jin S, Barzaghi R (Eds). Gravity, Geoid and Height Systems (International Association of Geodesy Symposia, 144). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2015_44
Pham HT, Claessens S, Kuhn M, Awange J (2023). Performance evaluation of high/ultra-high-degree global geopotential models over Vietnam using GNSS/leveling data. Geodesy and Geodynamics 14(5):500-512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2023.03.002
Rodell M, Velicogna I, Famiglietti JS (2009). Satellite-based estimates of groundwater deoletion in India. Nature 460(7258):999-1002. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08238
Sabbaghi H, Tabatabaei SH (2022a). Application of the most competent knowledge-driven integration method for deposit-scale studies. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 15(11):1057. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10217-z
Sabbaghi H, Tabatabaei SH (2022b). Execution of an applicable hybrid integration procedure for mineral prospectively mapping. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-11094-2
Sabbaghi H, Tabatabaei SH (2023). Data-driven logistic function for weighting of geophysical evidence layers in mineral prospectively mapping. Journal of Applied Geophysics 212:104986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2023.104986
Siegel EF (1999). Adaptive wavelet thresholding in de-noising of 2D Signals. Master Thesis. Electrical Engineering Department, University of Colorado.
Sohor A, Brydun A, Fys M, Dzhuman B (2022). Calculation of corrections to the spherical approximation of the components of the earth’s anomalous gravity field. In: International Conference of Young Professionals, GeoTerrace-2022, European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers 1:1-5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.2022590061
Tapley BD, Bettadpur S, Watkins M, Reigber C (2004). The gravity recovery and climate experiment: Mission overview and early results. Geophysical Research Letters 31(9):L09607. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019920
Torge W (2001). Geodesy (3rd Edition). Walter de Gruyter.
Varga M, Stipcevic J (2021). Gravity anomaly models with geophysical interpretation of the Republic of Croatia, including Adriatic and Dinarides regions. Geophysical Journal International 226(3):2189-2199. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggab180
Vries A (2006). Wavelets. FH Sudwestfalen University of Applied Sciences, Haldener Straße 182, D-58095 Hagen, Germany. Retrieved 2025 March 11 from https://www.math-it.org/Publikationen/Wavelets.pdf
Wahr J, Molenaar M, Bryan F (1998). Time variability of the Earth’s gravity field: Hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 103(B12):30205-30229. https://doi.org/10.1029/98JB02844
Zhang Y, Wang Z, Wang Y, Shi W (2020). Optimization of well spacing for tight sandstone gas reservoirs: A case study from the Sulige gas field in China. ACS Omega 5(4):1775-1783. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b04480
Zhao G, Wang X, Liu J, Chen B, Kaban MK, Xu Z (2023). 3D gravity inversion based on mixed-norm regularization in spherical coordinates with application to the lunar Moscoviense basin. Geophysics 88(3):G67-G78. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2022-0285.1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kolawole S. ILESANMI, Herbert TATA, Ifechukwu U. NZELIBE, Timothy O. IDOWU
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Distribution - Permissions - Copyright
Papers published in Nova Geodesia are Open-Access, distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
© Articles by the authors; licensee SMTCT, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright/to retain publishing rights without restriction.
License:
Open Access Journal - the journal offers free, immediate, and unrestricted access to peer-reviewed research and scholarly work, due to SMTCT support to increase the visibility, accessibility, and reputation of the researchers, regardless of geography and their budgets. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
