Analysis of three selected automated multibeam bathymetric filters in BeamWorX AutoClean Software
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55779/ng52335Keywords:
bathymetry, filtering, hydrography, multibeam, outliersAbstract
The increasing volume of bathymetric data acquisition, driven by citizen science initiatives and advancements in hydrographic survey technologies, particularly multibeam and LiDAR sensors, necessitates automated data-cleaning procedures. Manual data cleaning is labour-intensive, subjective, and time-consuming, often requiring two days of processing for a single day of observations. This study evaluates the performance of three widely used automated filters in BeamworX AutoClean software for multibeam bathymetric data cleaning. A multibeam survey was conducted along the jetty of the Nigerian Liquefied Natural Gas (NLNG) facility in Bonny, Rivers State, Nigeria. The acquired bathymetric data were processed using three selected automated filters: BWX Detailed, BWX Spline, and BWX Coarse. Statistical analysis revealed that the BWX Coarse Filter retained 94.45% of the data while rejecting 5.55%, achieving a conformity accuracy of 99.77%. The BWX Detailed Filter accepted 95.84% and rejected 4.16%, with a conformity accuracy of 97.60%. The BWX Spline Filter exhibited the highest footprint accuracy (99.99%) and the highest rejection rate (23.56%), indicating a more conservative approach that may discard valid seabed variations. The results highlight the trade-offs between strict filtering and data completeness. While the BWX Spline Filter ensures maximum accuracy, it significantly reduces data retention. In contrast, the BWX Coarse and Detailed Filters retain more data while maintaining high conformity accuracy, making them more suitable for general seabed mapping. These findings underscore the importance of selecting an appropriate filter based on specific survey requirements, balancing accuracy, noise reduction, and data preservation in hydrographic processing workflows.
Metrics
References
Arnold J, Shaw S (1993). A surface weaving approach to multibeam depth estimation. Proceedings of OCEANS '93, Victoria, BC, Canada, 18-21 October 1993, Vol 2:II/95-II/99. https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.1993.326073
Awange J (2018). GNSS Environmental Sensing: Revolutionizing Environmental Monitoring. Second Edition. Springer.
Basil DD (2024). Error analysis in multibeam hydrographic survey system. South African Journal of Geomatics 13(2):236-250. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajg.v13i2.2
Basil DD, Hart L, Kuro Tamuno PJ (2022). Assessment of the effects of sensors misalignment of a multi-beam hydrographic survey. World Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences 2(1):38-46. https://doi.org/10.31586/wjgg.2022.456
BeamWorX (2025). AutoClean. BeamWorX. Retrieved 2025 February 20, from https://www.beamworx.com/autoclean/
Bjørke JT, Nilsen S (2009). Fast trend extraction and identification of spikes in bathymetric data. Computers and Geosciences 35(6):1061-1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2008.05.009
Bjørn J, Einar B (2006). Time referencing in offshore survey systems. FFI/RAPPORT-2006/01666. Forsvarets Forskningsinstitutt (Norwegian Defence Research Establishment).
Bottelier P, Briese C, Hennis N, Lindenbergh R, Pfeifer N (2005). Distinguishing features from outliers in automatic Kriging-based filters of MBES data: a comparative study. Geostatics for Environmental Applications. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 403-414. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26535-X_34
Calder BR, Mayer LA (2003). Automatic processing of high‐rate, high‐density multibeam echosounder data. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 4(6):1048. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GC000486
Canepa G, Bergem O, Pace NG (2003). A new algorithm for automatic processing of bathymetric data. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 28(1):62-77. https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2002.808204
Chen ZH, Xia-Feng LU (2006). Gross error elimination in DEM data based on adaptive robust least squares estimation. Hydrographic Surveying and Charting 26(6):15-17.
De Wulf A, Constales D, Stal C, Nuttens T (2012). Accuracy aspects of processing and filtering of multibeam data: Grid modeling versus TIN based modeling. Proceedings of the FIG Working Week 2012: Knowing to Manage the Territory, Protect the Environment, Evaluate the Cultural Heritage, Rome, Italy, 6-10 May 2012; pp 6-10.
Debese N, Bisquay H (1999). Automatic detection of punctual errors in multibeam data using a robust estimator. International Hydrographic Review 76(1):49-63. https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/ihr/article/view/26159
Debese N, Seube N, Heydel L (2012). Qualitative and quantitative description of multibeam echosounder systematic errors on rocky areas. Marine Geodesy 35(3):306-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490419.2011.634963
Dong J, Peng R, Zhang L, Wang Z (2016). An algorithm of filtering noises in multi-beam data based on rolling circle transform. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University 41(1):86-92. https://dx.doi.org/10.13203/j.whugis20130757
Du Z, Wells D, Mayer L (1996). An approach to automatic detection of outliers in multibeam echo sounding data. The Hydrographic Journal 79:19-23.
El-Rabbany A (2002). Introduction to GPS: The Global Positioning System. Artech House, Boston, London.
Ferreira IO, Santos AP, Oliveira JC, Medeiros NG, Emiliano PC (2019). Spatial Outlier Detection Algorithm (SODA) applied to multibeam bathymetric data processing. Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas 25(4):e2019020. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1982-21702019000400020
Ferreira IO, Santos AP, Oliveira JC, Medeiros NG, Emiliano PC (2019). Robust methodology for detection of spikes in multibeam echo sounder data. Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas 25(3):e2019014. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1982-21702019000300014
Hofmann-Wellenhof B, Lichtenegger H, Walse E (2007). GNSS–Global Navigation Satellite Systems. GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, and More. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-73017-1
IHO (2005). Manual on Hydrography. International Hydrographic Bureau.
IHO (2020). Standards for Hydrographic Surveys, S-44 Edition 6.0.0. International Hydrographic Organization.
IHO (2022). IHO Standards for Hydrographic Surveys, S-44 Edition 6.1.0. International Hydrographic Organisation.
IPCC (2019). IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate. In: Pörtner H-O, Roberts DC, Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Tignor M, Poloczanska E, … Weyer NM (Eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, p 755.
Kazimierski W, Jaremba M (2023). On quality analysis of filtration methods for bathymetric data in harbour areas through QPS Qimera Software. Sensors 23(11):5076. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23115076
Le Deunf J, Debese N, Schmitt T, Billot R (2020). A review of data cleaning approaches in a hydrographic framework with a focus on bathymetric multibeam echosounder datasets. Geosciences 10(7):254. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10070254.
Lv X, Wang L, Huang D, Wang SA (2023). A novel cone model filtering method for outlier rejection of multibeam bathymetric point cloud: Principle and application. Sensors 23:7483. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23177483
Mann M, Agathoklis P, Antoniou A (2001). Automatic outlier detection in multibeam data using median filtering. IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computers and Signal Processing 2:690-693. https://doi.org/10.1109/PACRIM.2001.953726
Mann M, Agathoklis P, Antonious A (2001). An automatic outlier detection in multibeam data using median filtering. Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computers, and Signal Processing, Victoria, BC, Canada, 26–28 August 2001.
Mattijs DL (2015). Opportunistic multibeam surveying. Hydro International 19(6). Retrieved 2025 February 01 from https://www.hydro-international.com/magazines/hydro-international-september-2015.pdf
Mayer L, Jakobsson M, Allen G, Dorschel B, Falconer R, Ferrini V, Lamarche G, Snaith H, Weatherall P (2018). The Nippon Foundation—GEBCO Seabed 2030 Project: The Quest to See the World’s Oceans Completely Mapped by 2030. Geosciences 8(2):63. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8020063
Micallef A, Krastel S, Savini A (Eds) (2018). Submarine geomorphology. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Misra P, Enge P (2006). Global Positioning System: Signals, Measurements, and Performance. Second Edition, Ganga-Jamuna Press.
NASA (2016). NASA. Seafloor features are revealed by the gravity field. Retrieved 2025 February 01 from: https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/87189/seafloor-features-are-revealed-by-the-gravity-field
Odijk D, Teunissen PJG (2016). High-Precision GNSS. In: Grafarend E (Ed). Encyclopedia of Geodesy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02370-0_8-1
OECD (2016). The Ocean Economy in 2030. OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264251724-en
Ramsay P, Miller W (2010). Multibeam and sub-bottom profiling surveys for major port expansions. Position IT, 20, 29-33.
Santos AM, Santos GR, Emiliano PC, Medeiros ND, Kaleita AL, Pruski LD (2017). Detection of inconsistencies in geospatial data with geostatistics. Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas 23(2):296-308. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1982-21702017000200019
Shannon H, Karma K (2010). Multibeam Calibrations: Conducting a Patch Test NOAAC Ship Okeanos Explorer. NOAA Hydro Training Course, Pacific Hydro Branch. MBES Calibration Procedures, 2009.
Smith WHF (2004). Introduction to this special issue on bathymetry from space. Oceanography 17(1):6-7.
Somoza L, Medialdea T, González FJ, Machancoses S, Candón JA, Cid C., Madureira P (2021). High-resolution multibeam bathymetry of the northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge at 45-46° N: the Moytirra hydrothermal field. Journal of Maps 17(2):184-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2021.1898485
Wang S, Zhou P, Wu Z, Li J, Wei Y. (2018). Detection and elimination of bathymetric outliers in multibeam echosounders system based on robust multi-quadric method and median parameter model. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review 11(3):70-78.
Ware C, Slipp L, Wong KW, Nickerson B, Wells D, Lee YC, Dodd D, Costello G (1992). A system for cleaning high volume bathymetry. International Hydrographic Review 69:77-94. Retrieved 2025 February 20, from https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/ihr/article/view/26179
Wu Z, Yang F, Tang Y (2021). High-resolution seafloor survey and applications. Springer.
Yan Y, Yuan L, Ran L, Yin H, Xiao X (2022). Multi-beam data automatic filtering technology. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Geology, Mapping and Remote Sensing (ICGMRS) 2022, Zhoushan, China, 22–24 April 2022, pp 224-228.
Yan Y, Yuan L, Ran L, Yin H, Xiao X (2022). Multi-beam data automatic filtering technology. 3rd International Conference on Geology, Mapping and Remote Sensing (ICGMRS), Zhoushan, China, 2022, pp 224-228, IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGMRS55602.2022.9849352
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Daniel Devote BASIL
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Distribution - Permissions - Copyright
Papers published in Nova Geodesia are Open-Access, distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
© Articles by the authors; licensee SMTCT, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright/to retain publishing rights without restriction.
License:
Open Access Journal - the journal offers free, immediate, and unrestricted access to peer-reviewed research and scholarly work, due to SMTCT support to increase the visibility, accessibility, and reputation of the researchers, regardless of geography and their budgets. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
